The family office technology space has grown and evolved to offer many efficient solutions that embrace the latest emerging technology to solve the most common challenges

The 2023 Family Office Software Roundup

Are you ready to dive deep into the world of financial technology? Well, look no further! In this blog post, we are breaking down the latest reports on fintech, uncovering key trends and insights that will leave you astonished.

Breaking Down the Latest Financial Technology Reports: Key Trends and Insights

Welcome to the future of finance! The year is 2024, and as we dive deeper into the digital era, it’s no surprise that the Financial Technology Conference is back with a bang. Get ready to witness groundbreaking advancements,

Looking Ahead: What to Expect at the Financial Technology Conference 2024

As the nursing profession continues to evolve, it is embracing new technologies and practices that allow nurses to focus on what matters most — their patients.

Leadership Dialogue Series: At the Intersection of Technology and Nursing With Advocate Health

In today’s digital age, we find ourselves constantly immersed in a sea of advanced media technology. While this technology has undoubtedly transformed the way we live, work, and interact, it has also given rise to profound concerns about privacy and security.

Privacy Concerns in the Age of Advanced Media Technology: How to Stay Secure

In conclusion, technology has undoubtedly become a game-changer in how people travel and settle in new locations. From innovative transportation solutions and accommodation services to language and cultural integration tools, technology is breaking down barriers and making the world a more interconnected and accessible place.

Technology’s Role in Advancing Travel and Settlement Opportunities

Inefficient processes levy an emotional tax on HR teams, and they come with hefty price tags in the form of inefficient labor and poor benefits experiences, leading to disengagement and an unhealthy workforce.

How Intuitive Technology Is Changing The Benefits Landscape

KLDiscovery Inc. (“KLDiscovery” or the “Company”), a leading global provider of technology solutions for electronic discovery, information governance,

KLDiscovery introduces cutting-edge Alerting feature in its Client Portal, once again raising the standards of client support in the eDiscovery legal services industry

The IT services giant says GenAI will transform ... how last month’s Ryder Cup tested out technology to improve how fans digitally consume the event, and find out how Zurich Insurance has ...

Information technology (IT) in Italy

This article will summarize the top 20 ways AI revolutionizes information access through automatic summarizers

Simplifying Complexity: How AI is Reinventing Information Access through Automatic Summarization

Be Informed

beinformed

How Millions of Users Unwittingly Fed Their Facial Data to ChatGPT and the Consequences That Followed How Millions of Users Unwittingly Fed Their Facial Data to ChatGPT and the Consequences That Followed How Millions of Users Unwittingly Fed Their Facial Data to ChatGPT and the Consequences That Followed Picture this for once. You're scrolling through your favorite AI art generator, captivated by how your basic pictures were converted to a  beautifully rendered Ghibli-inspired portrait, and that too, within seconds. The magic of this automated image generation meets the whimsical world of Studio Ghibli, allowing you to create art with the click of a button. But beneath the surface of this captivating digital renaissance lies a troubling reality! In this article, we delve into the unsettling truth behind the AI art revolution, focusing on how millions of users have unknowingly contributed their facial recognition data to AI platforms. This is not only about the art you create; it is also about the personal data you leave behind, the possible consequences that could reshape security, and the future of digital art itself. The Rise of AI-Generated Art and the Ghibli Aesthetic The explosion of AI-generated art has been fueled by platforms like DALL·E, MidJourney, and ChatGPT and has given users an unparalleled opportunity to create stunning visuals with just a few words/prompts. One particular style that has been dominating the AI art world is the nostalgic, dreamlike quality of Studio Ghibli. Generations have been enthralled by Ghibli's whimsical charm, from Princess Mononoke to My Neighbor Totoro, and AI now makes it possible for anybody to create similar fantastical worlds. However, as more users went to these sites to produce their own Ghibli-inspired works of art, they inadvertently joined a far wider ecology of data harvesting. Not only are ChatGPT and other AI systems educated on text, but they also take in a variety of additional personal information, such as facial recognition data. Unaware of the consequences, users unintentionally enter their facial expressions, feelings, and even micro-reactions into the algorithms that drive these sites. Facial Recognition: The Invisible Price of Creative Freedom Even if AI-powered creative production is unquestionably innovative, it is critical to recognize the hidden costs that many users incur. Systems for facial recognition are modeled to examine every nuance of a person's face, which also includes emotions and minute variations in expression. Platforms like ChatGPT may be collecting biometric markers in addition to visual data when they request access to your camera or let users upload images. These markers could be utilized for purposes well beyond creating art. Every time you engage with an AI model, you’re not just interacting with a tool; you're feeding an algorithm. For millions of users, this data is not just used to improve art generation- it is stored, analyzed, and could be monetized by third-party companies. This is where things start to get murky!!! The Big Brother Potential: Facial Data and Surveillance The potential applications of facial recognition technology outside the creation of art are growing along with AI technology. What started off as a playful experiment with Ghibli-inspired graphics could eventually become a huge monitoring tool. Facial expression data can be used to forecast your behavior, customize material, and even subtly influence your emotions. Imagine this. Every smile, frown, or even the look of surprise could be analyzed and stored to create a digital profile of your emotional tendencies. Companies could then use that information to target you with ads or even influence the art you see, making it more aligned with your perceived emotional state. This, of course, assumes that facial recognition data is shared with or sold to third parties — a very real risk in an increasingly data-driven world. The Ethics of AI Art: Should We Be Concerned? At its core, the issue here isn't about privacy but ethics. Is it right for platforms to collect facial data without clear consent? Should the creators of these tools be transparent about how this information is used? The fact that many consumers are ignorant of how their data is being utilized exacerbates the issue. We frequently don't recognize that we are consenting to the processing and use of our facial data in ways we don't completely comprehend when we click "accept" on a terms-of-service agreement. It is the ethical duty of AI businesses to clarify this procedure and guarantee that customers can manage their data. Real-World Consequences: How Facial Data Could Be Misused Despite our desire to believe that our data is secure, practical examples have demonstrated that this is not the case. Facial recognition software has occasionally been used to follow people in public areas, track their emotions for advertising, and even support mass monitoring. There is a great deal of opportunity for this technology to be abused, and it frequently is. Take the increasingly popular "deepfake" technology, which makes use of AI and facial recognition to produce incredibly lifelike recordings of people speaking things they never actually uttered. Deepfakes might be amusing, but they can seriously jeopardize trust and privacy. It may soon be possible to produce deepfakes, sway public opinion, or harm reputations using the same facial data that drives art generators. Protecting Your Data: What Can You Do? Users must be more aware of their digital footprint in light of the possibilities. Here are a few steps you can actually take to protect your facial data: Be Informed: Always review the platforms' privacy policies. Verify what information they gather and how they intend to use it.
Control Your Data: Whenever feasible, take advantage of solutions that give you data management capabilities. Platforms should offer the ability to anonymize or remove your data.
Be Vigilant: Remain alert by routinely checking and updating your accounts' and devices' privacy settings. Give users access to facial recognition features with caution. Be Informed: Always review the platforms' privacy policies. Verify what information they gather and how they intend to use it. Be Informed Control Your Data: Whenever feasible, take advantage of solutions that give you data management capabilities. Platforms should offer the ability to anonymize or remove your data. Control Your Data Be Vigilant: Remain alert by routinely checking and updating your accounts' and devices' privacy settings. Give users access to facial recognition features with caution. Be Vigilant Conclusion: The Art of Balance One of the most fascinating developments in creative technology has been the emergence of AI-generated art, particularly the Ghibli-inspired designs. However, we must be aware of the hidden risks associated with this new frontier as we continue to explore it. Despite its strength, facial recognition raises a number of privacy issues that should not be disregarded. As users, we must demand more transparency and better control over how our data is used. In Parallel, companies need to take a more proactive role in safeguarding user privacy and ensuring that AI technologies are not misused for profit or surveillance. The future of AI art is bright, but we must ask ourselves: Are we willing to trade our privacy for creativity? The future of AI art is bright, but we must ask ourselves: Are we willing to trade our privacy for creativity? Would you like to take a stab at answering some of these questions? The link for the template is HERE. Interested in reading the content from all of our writing prompts? Click HERE. Would you like to take a stab at answering some of these questions? The link for the template is HERE. Interested in reading the content from all of our writing prompts? Click HERE. HERE HERE HERE. HERE

Behind the Canvas: The Hidden Cost of AI-Generated Ghibli Art

Facebook Ditches Fact-Checking: Time to Leave? Mark Zuckerberg just dropped a bombshell. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is abandoning its professional fact-checking program. Instead, they're moving to a "community-driven" system, putting the onus on users to determine what's true and what's not. Zuckerberg says it's about fostering "free speech," but it feels a lot like abdicating responsibility, saving money, bowing down to political pressure, and more. Frankly, it's the last straw. I'm done with Facebook. I've been wrestling with this for a while now. The endless scroll, the monetization of my life, the performative outrage, the nagging feeling that I'm being manipulated by algorithms, the blatant and widely covered manipulation... it's exhausting. But this latest move? It's a dealbreaker. Look, I get the appeal of crowdsourcing. The wisdom of the crowd, right? But when it comes to complex issues, "common sense" isn't always enough. We need experts. We need evidence. We need nuanced analysis, not just knee-jerk reactions and confirmation bias. Zuckerberg, in his infinite wisdom (read: with a healthy dose of self-preservation), has decided to throw his fact-checking partners under the bus. Possibly, those annoying truth-tellers were just too good at their jobs, exposing uncomfortable truths and generally making life difficult for the Facebook overlords. According to Zuck, these fact-checkers were "too politically biased" and, get this, "destroyed more trust than they created." It's a classic case of blaming the Messenger, wouldn't you say? Of course, the fact-checking organizations themselves aren't taking this lying down. They've fired back, pointing out the obvious: they simply flagged potentially false content. What Facebook chose to do with that information was entirely up to them. It's a bit like a chef blaming the health inspector for a dirty kitchen. "Oh, those inspectors are just too picky! They're ruining my reputation!" Never mind the fact that the kitchen's a mess and the menu is probably giving people food poisoning. Take climate change, for example. The science is clear, yet misinformation runs rampant on social media. Do we really want the veracity of climate data determined by a popularity contest? Or how about public health? Anti-vaccine sentiment is already a serious problem, fueled by conspiracy theories and misleading claims. Letting those narratives go unchecked - or chosen to be true by coordinated consortiums of community members that have an agenda and a vote - could have devastating consequences. This isn't about censorship. It's about accountability. Social media platforms have a responsibility to ensure the information they disseminate is accurate and trustworthy. They've become our primary source of news and information, and with that power comes a responsibility to combat the spread of harmful falsehoods. So where do we go from here? I, for one, am turning to platforms and tools that prioritize expert verification and rigorous fact-checking. Solutions like Factiverse, for example, which leverages a network of over 350k human-performed fact-checks from more than 100 trusted outlets globally to analyze information and provide context. Factiverse's approach gives me hope and gives me the tools to see which sources back up and contest a statement, so I can be informed and balanced. It's a reminder that truth still matters, and that there are people out there dedicated to upholding it. In a world where facts are increasingly contested, we need reliable sources of information more than ever. Maybe Zuckerberg's gamble will pay off. Maybe the "wisdom of the crowd" will prevail. But I'm not sticking around to find out. I'm logging off Facebook and investing my time in platforms that value truth and accuracy. Because in the end, facts matter. And we all deserve better than to be drowning in a sea of misinformation. Facebook Ditches Fact-Checking: Time to Leave? Facebook Ditches Fact-Checking: Time to Leave? Mark Zuckerberg just dropped a bombshell. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is abandoning its professional fact-checking program. Instead, they're moving to a "community-driven" system, putting the onus on users to determine what's true and what's not. Zuckerberg says it's about fostering "free speech," but it feels a lot like abdicating responsibility, saving money, bowing down to political pressure, and more. Frankly, it's the last straw. I'm done with Facebook. I've been wrestling with this for a while now. The endless scroll, the monetization of my life, the performative outrage, the nagging feeling that I'm being manipulated by algorithms, the blatant and widely covered manipulation... it's exhausting. But this latest move? It's a dealbreaker. Look, I get the appeal of crowdsourcing. The wisdom of the crowd, right? But when it comes to complex issues, "common sense" isn't always enough. We need experts. We need evidence. We need nuanced analysis, not just knee-jerk reactions and confirmation bias. Zuckerberg, in his infinite wisdom (read: with a healthy dose of self-preservation), has decided to throw his fact-checking partners under the bus. Possibly, those annoying truth-tellers were just too good at their jobs, exposing uncomfortable truths and generally making life difficult for the Facebook overlords. According to Zuck , these fact-checkers were "too politically biased" and, get this, "destroyed more trust than they created." It's a classic case of blaming the Messenger, wouldn't you say? According to Zuck According to Zuck Of course, the fact-checking organizations themselves aren't taking this lying down. They've fired back , pointing out the obvious: they simply flagged potentially false content. What Facebook chose to do with that information was entirely up to them. They've fired back They've fired back It's a bit like a chef blaming the health inspector for a dirty kitchen. "Oh, those inspectors are just too picky! They're ruining my reputation!" Never mind the fact that the kitchen's a mess and the menu is probably giving people food poisoning. Take climate change, for example. The science is clear, yet misinformation runs rampant on social media. Do we really want the veracity of climate data determined by a popularity contest? Or how about public health? Anti-vaccine sentiment is already a serious problem, fueled by conspiracy theories and misleading claims. Letting those narratives go unchecked - or chosen to be true by coordinated consortiums of community members that have an agenda and a vote - could have devastating consequences. This isn't about censorship. It's about accountability. Social media platforms have a responsibility to ensure the information they disseminate is accurate and trustworthy. They've become our primary source of news and information, and with that power comes a responsibility to combat the spread of harmful falsehoods. So where do we go from here? I, for one, am turning to platforms and tools that prioritize expert verification and rigorous fact-checking. Solutions like Factiverse , for example, which leverages a network of over 350k human-performed fact-checks from more than 100 trusted outlets globally to analyze information and provide context. Factiverse Factiverse Factiverse's approach gives me hope and gives me the tools to see which sources back up and contest a statement, so I can be informed and balanced. It's a reminder that truth still matters, and that there are people out there dedicated to upholding it. In a world where facts are increasingly contested, we need reliable sources of information more than ever. Maybe Zuckerberg's gamble will pay off. Maybe the "wisdom of the crowd" will prevail. But I'm not sticking around to find out. I'm logging off Facebook and investing my time in platforms that value truth and accuracy. Because in the end, facts matter. And we all deserve better than to be drowning in a sea of misinformation.

The Facebook Exodus: Why I'm Leaving and Why Expert Verification Matters More Than Ever

Kerberoasting: A Gateway to Privilege Escalation in Enterprise Networks

Hello Amazon aspirants!! I have recently cleared all interviews for the QAE II position at Amazon. I would like to share about the interview process, expectations, preparation tips and the resources I referred to during my preparation. Most of the information is already present on Web/YouTube. I am giving links to all resources here. Note: I am not giving any questions from my interview as I have signed disclosure not to share. About process Before jumping into preparation, first you need to understand the hiring process. After applying, I got a call from a recruiter. He explained me the process as below - Online Assessment — Link will be shared to us, and we will have around 1 week to finish that.
Phone Interview — This is 1 hour round, in which questions will be asked on 3 aspects: 1. Test cases ; 2. Coding; 3. Leadership Principles (Preparation is same as explained for Main interview)
Main Interview — 5 different rounds — 1 hr each (Total 5hrs). Here we have option to have all rounds on same day (there will be lunch break 1hr) OR we can divide them for 2 different days Below are those 5 rounds. Not necessarily in the same order. Online test: About testing process, behavioral and situation based questions. Objective type. 1. Coding 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation 3. Test Planning / Strategy 4. Debugging round 5. Leadership Principles After completion of all the above interviews, the panel will meet and decide on your candidature. Within a week, the recruiter can provide you with feedback. Apart from this, go through the previous QA interview experiences from the Leetcode discussions section. *Important — One of the rounds in the process is “Leadership Principles”, where you will be asked certain situational based questions which you need to answer based on the examples in your experience. Similar leadership principles questions, 1–2 will be asked on other 4 rounds also. Around 30% of the other 4 rounds will be focussed on leadership principles questions and remaining 70% will be actual interviews about that round (Coding, Debugging, Testcases, TestPlanning). So, Leadership Principles questions are very important when you are preparing for an Amazon interview. Preparation: 1. Coding - First I started preparing for the Coding round. I got a Leetcode subscription. The difference with Leetcode subscription is, we will have more questions and we will have company tag names to the coding questions. I filtered all “Amazon” + “Easy” programs. In that, I have excluded questions related to Trees, graph related questions. Of the remaining challenges, I started solving them daily. Most of these challenges are based on Arrays, Strings, Collections. Initially, when I had no clue on the approach, I used to see the answer on the web and tried to understand(many YouTube videos are there for each question). In that way, I have improved and could solve new problems on my own. That way I did practice around 60 easy problems from Leetcode(There are around 200+ Amazon+Easy problems in Leetcode, related to Arrays, Strings, Collections). Apart from this, I have read past Amazon QAE interview experiences on Leetcode and different websites and collected some questions(around 15) and solved them too. In Total, I have solved around 75 problems. I repeated solving them 3–4 times. It doesn’t mean that we get interview questions from leetcode / previous questions. It only gives confidence to you to solve similar questions. I have focussed only on basic concepts — Arrays, Stings, Collections(HashMaps mostly) related programs. Also, refer this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdeoqgEUSvE&embedable=true 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation Here, you may be asked to list test cases for any given scenario. Do follow the video below for the tips on how to answer. These tips are very important. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz2oHPpz2hM&embedable=true Be prepared for 1–2 questions on leadership principles (mentioned on this topic at last) 3. Test Planning & Test Strategy Be prepared to write TestPlan / TestStrategy for any given scenario. You may be given any scenario, and will be asked to write / explain the test plan for it. Always, ask clarifying questions. https://www.guru99.com/how-to-create-test-strategy-document.html Be prepared for 1–2 questions on leadership principles (mentioned on this topic at last). 4. Debugging round In this round, you will be given an issue / bug and you will be asked to debug it. Basically, you need to explain the steps / checks you perform to isolate the issue. This video is helpful - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65_8WUtwDnE&embedable=true There are some sample questions here. Be prepared for 1–2 questions on leadership principles (mentioned on this topic at last). 5. Leadership Principles This is a very important area. Amazon has 14 leadership principles. You need to study and understand these principles. In the call with the recruiter, you will be informed if any of the 14 principles are not applicable to your role(QA). In my case, 2 are excluded. It means I need to prepare another 12 leadership principles. You will be given any situation based question and you need to answer it based on any related example in your past. Be prepared to explain it in detail with the background of the situation, what you did, how you did and results and learnings out of it. In many blogs and other experiences, it is recommended to have atleast 2 unique examples for each principle as the question may be repeated across the rounds and you should not repeat the same example/answer. Below is the great website, which helped me in understanding them, and know different types of questions based on each principle with sample answers. Take that as reference and build your own answers. https://interviewgenie.com/resources In the above page, go to this section - “The 16 Leadership Principles with Sample Questions and Answers That Get Results” That’s it for now! Please let me know if you have any doubts. Wish you all the best!! Hello Amazon aspirants!! I have recently cleared all interviews for the QAE II position at Amazon. I would like to share about the interview process, expectations, preparation tips and the resources I referred to during my preparation. Most of the information is already present on Web/YouTube. I am giving links to all resources here. Note: I am not giving any questions from my interview as I have signed disclosure not to share. About process About process Before jumping into preparation, first you need to understand the hiring process. After applying, I got a call from a recruiter. He explained me the process as below - Online Assessment — Link will be shared to us, and we will have around 1 week to finish that. Phone Interview — This is 1 hour round, in which questions will be asked on 3 aspects: 1. Test cases ; 2. Coding; 3. Leadership Principles (Preparation is same as explained for Main interview) Main Interview — 5 different rounds — 1 hr each (Total 5hrs). Here we have option to have all rounds on same day (there will be lunch break 1hr) OR we can divide them for 2 different days Online Assessment — Link will be shared to us, and we will have around 1 week to finish that. Phone Interview — This is 1 hour round, in which questions will be asked on 3 aspects: 1. Test cases ; 2. Coding; 3. Leadership Principles (Preparation is same as explained for Main interview) Main Interview — 5 different rounds — 1 hr each (Total 5hrs). Here we have option to have all rounds on same day (there will be lunch break 1hr) OR we can divide them for 2 different days Below are those 5 rounds. Not necessarily in the same order. Online test: Online test: About testing process, behavioral and situation based questions. Objective type. 1. Coding 1. Coding 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation 3. Test Planning / Strategy 3. Test Planning / Strategy 4. Debugging round 4. Debugging round 5. Leadership Principles 5. Leadership Principles After completion of all the above interviews, the panel will meet and decide on your candidature. Within a week, the recruiter can provide you with feedback. Apart from this, go through the previous QA interview experiences from the Leetcode discussions section. *Important — One of the rounds in the process is “Leadership Principles”, where you will be asked certain situational based questions which you need to answer based on the examples in your experience. Similar leadership principles questions, 1–2 will be asked on other 4 rounds also. Around 30% of the other 4 rounds will be focussed on leadership principles questions and remaining 70% will be actual interviews about that round (Coding, Debugging, Testcases, TestPlanning). So, Leadership Principles questions are very important when you are preparing for an Amazon interview. So, Leadership Principles questions are very important when you are preparing for an Amazon interview. Preparation: Preparation: 1. Coding - 1. Coding - 1. Coding - First I started preparing for the Coding round. I got a Leetcode subscription. The difference with Leetcode subscription is, we will have more questions and we will have company tag names to the coding questions. I filtered all “Amazon” + “Easy” programs. In that, I have excluded questions related to Trees, graph related questions. Of the remaining challenges, I started solving them daily. Most of these challenges are based on Arrays, Strings, Collections. Initially, when I had no clue on the approach, I used to see the answer on the web and tried to understand(many YouTube videos are there for each question). In that way, I have improved and could solve new problems on my own. That way I did practice around 60 easy problems from Leetcode(There are around 200+ Amazon+Easy problems in Leetcode, related to Arrays, Strings, Collections). Apart from this, I have read past Amazon QAE interview experiences on Leetcode and different websites and collected some questions(around 15) and solved them too. In Total, I have solved around 75 problems. I repeated solving them 3–4 times. It doesn’t mean that we get interview questions from leetcode / previous questions. It only gives confidence to you to solve similar questions. I have focussed only on basic concepts — Arrays, Stings, Collections(HashMaps mostly) related programs. Also, refer this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdeoqgEUSvE&embedable=true https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdeoqgEUSvE&embedable=true 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation 2. Test case Enumeration & Test data preparation Here, you may be asked to list test cases for any given scenario. Do follow the video below for the tips on how to answer. These tips are very important. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz2oHPpz2hM&embedable=true https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz2oHPpz2hM&embedable=true Be prepared for 1–2 questions on leadership principles (mentioned on this topic at last) 3. Test Planning & Test Strategy 3. Test Planning & Test Strategy 3. Test Planning & Test Strategy Be prepared to write TestPlan / TestStrategy for any given scenario. You may be given any scenario, and will be asked to write / explain the test plan for it. Always, ask clarifying questions. https://www.guru99.com/how-to-create-test-strategy-document.html https://www.guru99.com/how-to-create-test-strategy-document.html Be prepared for 1–2 questions on leadership principles (mentioned on this topic at last). 4. Debugging round 4. Debugging round 4. Debugging round In this round, you will be given an issue / bug and you will be asked to debug it. Basically, you need to explain the steps / checks you perform to isolate the issue. This video is helpful - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65_8WUtwDnE&embedable=true https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65_8WUtwDnE&embedable=true There are some sample questions here . here Be prepared for 1–2 questions on leadership principles (mentioned on this topic at last). 5. Leadership Principles 5. Leadership Principles 5. Leadership Principles This is a very important area. Amazon has 14 leadership principles. 14 You need to study and understand these principles. In the call with the recruiter, you will be informed if any of the 14 principles are not applicable to your role(QA). In my case, 2 are excluded. It means I need to prepare another 12 leadership principles. You will be given any situation based question and you need to answer it based on any related example in your past. Be prepared to explain it in detail with the background of the situation, what you did, how you did and results and learnings out of it. In many blogs and other experiences, it is recommended to have atleast 2 unique examples for each principle as the question may be repeated across the rounds and you should not repeat the same example/answer. Below is the great website, which helped me in understanding them, and know different types of questions based on each principle with sample answers. Take that as reference and build your own answers. https://interviewgenie.com/resources https://interviewgenie.com/resources In the above page, go to this section - “The 16 Leadership Principles with Sample Questions and Answers That Get Results” “The 16 Leadership Principles with Sample Questions and Answers That Get Results” That’s it for now! Please let me know if you have any doubts. Wish you all the best!!

How I Cracked the Amazon QAE II Interview

Schools have to play a crucial role in safeguarding children from all kinds of threats, and one that often flies under the radar is cyber attacks. Unfortunately, schools are a gold mine for criminals with invaluable data related to personal information and financial details which can be sold to the highest bidder on the black market. This was the case towards the end of last year, as thousands of students’ data was leaked in the Louisiana school district. A supply chain attack is one method that has been gaining a lot of traction recently, whereby an attack on an outside provider can lead to the attacker being able to infiltrate the school’s digital infrastructure. If the outside provider has been granted access rights to use the network or other applications, then the attacker would only need to get through the third party’s defenses to infiltrate the school’s system. This type of attack is particularly interesting to criminals—and devastating to victims—because they can gain access to multiple districts and mountains of data through one vendor. Types of supply chain attacks include stealing security certificates, compromising software development tools, preinstalling malware on devices, and embedding malicious code in firmware. For example, if a hacker steals a certificate used to authenticate a software update, they can use it to distribute malware disguised as a legitimate update. In schools, where IT resources may already be stretched thin, detecting these kinds of sophisticated attacks is very difficult. Supply chain attacks are very broad and can impact organizations of all types and sizes. Let’s examine where they tend to come from and their impact before discussing how schools can better defend themselves. The Source of Supply Chain Attacks Supply chain attacks can come from a variety of places and, depending on the source, can bring their own set of risks. Commercial software is something that every school will have across its network, and hackers can insert malicious code into a common software application that would then gain access to any school using that particular software. The problem is that schools often depend on software updates to patch vulnerabilities, but the updates themselves are actually one of the most common areas to exploit. One of the most famous examples came a few years back in 2020, when the major software company, __SolarWinds, was hacked with a backdoor __inserted into one of their IT management tools, and thousands of government organizations and schools around the world were affected.Another common source comes from open-source software where schools use these solutions as they’re generally more scalable and cost-effective, but this can also leave them more vulnerable. During the development process, hackers can introduce vulnerabilities, and then they wreak havoc when the software is finally implemented. There was a clear incident of this earlier this year when a software engineer found a backdoor that had gone unnoticed after two years of a group calledJia Tan implementing versions of XZ Utils, providing hours of largely benign volunteer coding into the open-source software, Linux. Lastly, we need to touch on foreign-sourced threats, which can be dangerous when schools are using systems from outside the country in their networks. Some countries have varying controls on tech industries, so schools need to be careful. What is the Impact of Supply Chain Attacks on Schools? There can be a huge impact on schools that are victims of supply chain attacks, including the disruption of administrative functions and the educational process. One of the biggest risks obviously comes from data breaches, where student records, financial details, and even potentially health data can be leaked. This could easily lead to privacy violations and identity theft.Schools also depend on software for scheduling, grading, and virtual classrooms, and if that is compromised, it can cause huge interruptions, with students and teachers unable to access vital resources. Lastly, financial costs, although seemingly not as prevalent in a supply chain attack, can still be a consequence. Ransomware can lock critical systems through compromised software. Even if the ransom is not paid, restoring systems and implementing stronger security measures is expensive. What Are The Mitigation Strategies? There are various ways that schools can go about mitigating supply chain attacks, primarily schools must have cybersecurity measures in place to protect their systems. They are outlined by the Department for Education, and involve a range of steps, from simple steps such as adopting multi-factor authentication to more complex data protection impact assessments. Regular software updates are important, but they are far from being fool-proof, schools need to be informed about any potential vulnerabilities that could arise in the software that they use. This can be done by monitoring cyber news and having open lines of communication with their vendors to stay on top of emerging threats. Access control is another element that can’t go unnoticed. Schools need to always review who has access to their systems and ensure that permissions are limited to the necessary people. The final mitigation strategy to mention is testing out incident response plans. This should involve explaining what steps would need to be taken in the event of a supply chain attack and how to isolate compromised systems, restore data from backups, and communicate with stakeholders. These kinds of drills mean that staff are ready to act quickly and effectively when an attack occurs. Supply chain attacks are undoubtedly brutal, and hackers can exploit weaknesses in schools, and their impact can be devastating. However, following some of the steps outlined above can at least mitigate the potential impact if staff are dedicated to prioritizing cybersecurity and good hygiene. Schools have to play a crucial role in safeguarding children from all kinds of threats, and one that often flies under the radar is cyber attacks. Unfortunately, schools are a gold mine for criminals with invaluable data related to personal information and financial details which can be sold to the highest bidder on the black market. This was the case towards the end of last year, as thousands of students’ data was leaked in the Louisiana school district. Schools have to play a crucial role in safeguarding children from all kinds of threats, and one that often flies under the radar is cyber attacks. Unfortunately, schools are a gold mine for criminals with invaluable data related to personal information and financial details which can be sold to the highest bidder on the black market. This was the case towards the end of last year, as thousands of students’ data was leaked in the Louisiana school district . leaked in the Louisiana school district leaked in the Louisiana school district A supply chain attack is one method that has been gaining a lot of traction recently, whereby an attack on an outside provider can lead to the attacker being able to infiltrate the school’s digital infrastructure. If the outside provider has been granted access rights to use the network or other applications, then the attacker would only need to get through the third party’s defenses to infiltrate the school’s system. This type of attack is particularly interesting to criminals—and devastating to victims—because they can gain access to multiple districts and mountains of data through one vendor. Types of supply chain attacks include stealing security certificates, compromising software development tools, preinstalling malware on devices, and embedding malicious code in firmware. For example, if a hacker steals a certificate used to authenticate a software update, they can use it to distribute malware disguised as a legitimate update. In schools, where IT resources may already be stretched thin, detecting these kinds of sophisticated attacks is very difficult. Supply chain attacks are very broad and can impact organizations of all types and sizes. Let’s examine where they tend to come from and their impact before discussing how schools can better defend themselves. The Source of Supply Chain Attacks Supply chain attacks can come from a variety of places and, depending on the source, can bring their own set of risks. Commercial software is something that every school will have across its network, and hackers can insert malicious code into a common software application that would then gain access to any school using that particular software. The problem is that schools often depend on software updates to patch vulnerabilities, but the updates themselves are actually one of the most common areas to exploit. One of the most famous examples came a few years back in 2020, when the major software company, __ SolarWinds, was hacked with a backdoor __inserted into one of their IT management tools, and thousands of government organizations and schools around the world were affected. Another common source comes from open-source software where schools use these solutions as they’re generally more scalable and cost-effective, but this can also leave them more vulnerable. During the development process, hackers can introduce vulnerabilities, and then they wreak havoc when the software is finally implemented. There was a clear incident of this earlier this year when a software engineer found a backdoor that had gone unnoticed after two years of a group called Jia Tan implementing versions of XZ Utils , providing hours of largely benign volunteer coding into the open-source software, Linux. SolarWinds, was hacked with a backdoor Jia Tan implementing versions of XZ Utils Jia Tan implementing versions of XZ Utils Lastly, we need to touch on foreign-sourced threats, which can be dangerous when schools are using systems from outside the country in their networks. Some countries have varying controls on tech industries, so schools need to be careful. What is the Impact of Supply Chain Attacks on Schools? There can be a huge impact on schools that are victims of supply chain attacks, including the disruption of administrative functions and the educational process. One of the biggest risks obviously comes from data breaches, where student records, financial details, and even potentially health data can be leaked. This could easily lead to privacy violations and identity theft. Schools also depend on software for scheduling, grading, and virtual classrooms, and if that is compromised, it can cause huge interruptions, with students and teachers unable to access vital resources. Lastly, financial costs, although seemingly not as prevalent in a supply chain attack, can still be a consequence. Ransomware can lock critical systems through compromised software. Even if the ransom is not paid, restoring systems and implementing stronger security measures is expensive. What Are The Mitigation Strategies? There are various ways that schools can go about mitigating supply chain attacks, primarily schools must have cybersecurity measures in place to protect their systems. They are outlined by the Department for Education , and involve a range of steps, from simple steps such as adopting multi-factor authentication to more complex data protection impact assessments. outlined by the Department for Education outlined by the Department for Education Regular software updates are important, but they are far from being fool-proof, schools need to be informed about any potential vulnerabilities that could arise in the software that they use. This can be done by monitoring cyber news and having open lines of communication with their vendors to stay on top of emerging threats. Access control is another element that can’t go unnoticed. Schools need to always review who has access to their systems and ensure that permissions are limited to the necessary people. The final mitigation strategy to mention is testing out incident response plans. This should involve explaining what steps would need to be taken in the event of a supply chain attack and how to isolate compromised systems, restore data from backups, and communicate with stakeholders. These kinds of drills mean that staff are ready to act quickly and effectively when an attack occurs. Supply chain attacks are undoubtedly brutal, and hackers can exploit weaknesses in schools, and their impact can be devastating. However, following some of the steps outlined above can at least mitigate the potential impact if staff are dedicated to prioritizing cybersecurity and good hygiene.

How Can Schools Be Better Prepared for Supply Chain Attacks?

Your Complete Guide to Self-Hosting Umami Analytics with Vercel and Supabase

Rio: WebApps in Pure Python - Technical Description

This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Pietro Ghezzi, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK; (2) Peter G Bannister, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK; (3) Gonzalo Casino, Communication Department, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain and Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Barcelona, Spain; (4) Alessia Catalani, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, PU, Italy; (5) Michel Goldman, Institute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in healthcare (I3h), Université libre de Bruxelles; (6) Jessica Morley, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; (7) Marie Neunez, Institute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in healthcare (I3h), Université libre de Bruxelles; (8) Andreu Prados, Communication Department, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain, Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, PU, Italy, Institute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in healthcare (I3h), Université libre de Bruxelles, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, and Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain; (9) Mariarosaria Taddeo, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain, and The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK; (10) Tania Vanzolini, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, PU, Italy; (11) Luciano Floridi, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain, and The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK. Table of Links Abstract and Introduction Methods Web search and content analysis Results Discussion Conclusion and References Table 1. Example of classification of webpages Table 2. Percentage of vaccine-negative webpages in different SERPs Discussion The aim of this research was to investigate whether search engines focused on privacy preservation ranked webpages with higher and/or lower levels of IQ (interpreted as EBM based content i.e. vaccine-positive rather than vaccine-negative) differently to the primary commercial search engines. In turn, this answered the research question “What is the current relationship between search engines’ approach to privacy and the scientific quality of the information they return?”. The results indicate that currently privacy-enhancing search engines often give more visibility to webpages promoting vaccine hesitancy or with a clear anti-vaccine position than Google. This is in agreement with the findings from a recent study by the Economist which analyzed 175,000 news links returned by Google to demonstrate that the search engine’s algorithm favorstrustworthy publications 20. Reputation and trustworthiness are key factors included in Google’s ranking algorithm. In 2019, Google published search quality evaluation guidelines, 4 which define webpages containing information that may affect the users’ health or financial stability, as “your money your life” (YMYL) pages. These guidelines reveal that when rating YMYL webpages, Google looks at the three criteria of Expertise-Authority-Trustworthiness (EA-T) and states “High E-A-T information pages on scientific topics should be produced by people or organizations with appropriate scientific expertise and represent well-established scientific consensus on issues where such consensus exists”. Thus, in the case of Google, the bandwagon heuristic mechanism of assessing medical information credibility is working in favour of promoting IQ. This is perhaps because those responsible for driving up the ‘reputation’ of specific websites by, for example, linking to them, have higher levels of eHealth literacy and therefore act as pseudo-gatekeepers protecting those with lower eHealth literacy from poor IQ results by ensuring that websites providing inaccurate online health information have a low ranking in the search results. In the case of privacy-preserving engines this appears not to be working – potentially because they do not track ‘reputation’ factors, which could be seen as proxies for IQ and credibility, e.g. clicks and bounce-rate, and so have no gatekeepers (pseudo or otherwise) working to limit the circulation of misinformation. To our knowledge, the algorithms used by these ‘alternative’ search engines are not public - Qwant states that they use their own algorithms5 - but despite this, we found a large overlap between the SERP of Qwant and those of Bing and Ecosia. Likewise, Ecosia and Swisscows showed a similar overlap (70%) with Bing. This means that it is not possible to check what factors determine the outcome of the decision making processes of the search engines algorithms, and hence identify those elements that contribute to circulate misinformation. Even without being able to check the exact mechanisms for the overall poorer results, the results suggest that, currently, decisions made by search engines to prioritize privacypreservation may have a negative impact on the IQ of results returned to users in health contexts. The pledge to provide independent and unbiased results or not to promote or hide websites based on political or moral interests can be seen as ethically ambiguous, in view of the potential consequences of pointing to scientifically unsound health information. Medical ethics requires that patients give informed consent before treatment and must, therefore, be informed accurately of the risks and benefits associated with treatment, something that is not possible if the search engine provider used by an individual is returning results with low IQ. From this consequentialist perspective, it is inherently unethical choosing not to interfere with a search engine’s ranking algorithm to ensure ‘manually’ that results of higher IQ are prioritized, whilst those of lower IQ are suppressed. This builds on arguments already made in the wider literature about algorithm ethics 21,22. For example, the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) code of ethics and professional conduct includes, as a general principle, “avoid harm” along with that of “respect privacy” 23, which aligns with the Hippocratic oath. Specifically, the implication that the current design of privacy-preserving search engine algorithms underestimates the need for evaluation of IQ fits into the wider discussion about algorithmic design and how to ensure design decisions are made to protect and incorporate key values such as IQ. It is necessary, but insufficient, to design search engine algorithms that index purely on ‘relevance’, they must also be designed to index on quality. The challenge lies in the ability to do this in a way that balances the need to accept different perspectives (particularly those that are rooted in different cultural, religious or social ideals) whilst also filtering for IQ. Supporters of such arguments, including the authors, note that this requirement necessitates making the workings of search engine algorithms more transparent 24 to ensure their ethical compliance. Providing information on vaccines that is based on misinformation or disinformation (including studies whose data or conclusions have been shown to be wrong) is a deceptive practice, which goes against the basic tenets of medical and business ethics 25. This is in line with those who argue that the promotion of ‘alternative medicine’ is unethical because it lacks evidence and transparency of clinical efficacy and should be considered ‘false advertising’ 26. Online service providers have a moral responsibilities to ensure that users access health information that is scientifically validate 27. Misinformation and disinformation concerning healthcare circulating on the internet can have severe consequences and lead to widespread harm. Consider the example of South African president Mbeki, who delayed introducing anti-retroviral drugs in favor of alternative medicine based on information obtained from HIV-denialist internet websites, a decision estimated to have resulted in over 300,000 deaths 28. More recently, a cancer patient died in China after following an alternative, non-approved therapy they found using a search engine 29. In response Chinese authorities issued new rules that require search engines to provide “objective, fair and authoritative results”. Moral responsibility follows on the level of harm that misinformation and disinformation on healthcare may cause. It could be argued that there is a greater onus on Google – and other commercial search engine providers – than on alternative search engines to take these considerations into account when designing or interfering with algorithms for the purposes of promoting ethical compliance, given their larger market share. Google currently has over 90% of the worldwide market share6 and therefore has the potential to indirectly ‘cause harm’, through the potential promotion of low IQ webpages on vaccinations, to a great many more people than any of the alternative providers. However, studies have shown that those who hold anti-authoritarian views, openness to (potentially) controversial opinions, and an interest in alternative medicine are, in some cases, already more likely to hold vaccine-hesitant beliefs 30. These are also the individuals who are most likely to use alternative search providers given their sensitivity to privacy and tracking concerns. Therefore, while the alternative providers might reach a proportionally smaller audience – they are reaching an audience that is already more receptive to antivaccine information 31, and therefore more vulnerable to its effects. In other words, unless the alternative providers take steps to rank vaccine-related search results according to IQ, they may cause greater harm to those they do reach, meaning that the net negative impact is still greater even though the number of individuals they reach is smaller.

Online Information of Vaccines: Discussion

At SXSW this year, , CEO of the Future Today Institute, once again delivered a session as a lighthouse in the "technology supercycle" reshaping our world. Webb, a renowned author and professor at NYU Stern School of Business, shared key insights from the in an enlightening one-hour session. Despite having to catch a rerun due to simultaneous sessions, here's what I gathered: Amy Webb 17th Annual Technology Trends Report The Technology Supercycle We're smack in the middle of a "technology supercycle era," driven by the convergence of three general-purpose technologies: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Biotechnology Connected Device/Sensor Ecosystem This supercycle has the potential to reshape our economy and society in ways unseen since the Industrial Revolution and the dawn of the internet age. AI Trends Despite the hype and popularity of AI, there are still unresolved and often misunderstood big issues, including bias, accountability, and the risk of open-source models being used for nefarious purposes. Generative AI is evolving rapidly, moving from text-based models to a "concept to concrete" paradigm that can embody broad ideas. Smart Device Ecosystem: A New Black Mirror Episode There's an explosion of interest and development in smart device and sensor technology. These tech products, which include "face computers" (VR/AR headsets) and wearables that can read human intention, feed more real-world data into AI through "large action models." This raises privacy and social scoring concerns. Biotechnology Breakthroughs Advances in synthetic biology and biological computers made from human brain cells (organoid intelligence) could move us beyond silicon-based computing. This could pave the way for faster, more efficient, and more powerful computing systems that require less energy. This aligns with the theory of exascale computers mentioned in the MIT Technology Trends Report. Societal Impacts and Recommendations The concentration of power among a group of tech leaders following a techno-utopian vision is concerning. Governments should establish new departments and organizations to plan for the disruptive effects of the technology supercycle on industries and jobs. Companies must start mapping out evolving value networks to anticipate disruptions and create future value. To Succeed Individually in the Technology Supercycle, Webb Suggests: Strive to be informed about trends shaping our era and their potential impacts on your business. Begin to adopt strategic foresight and long-term planning to anticipate and adapt to disruptive changes. Engage in discussions on shaping the technology supercycle towards a more equitable future for all, and take an active role. This session with Amy Webb offered a comprehensive roadmap for navigating the currents and undercurrents of the technology supercycle, emphasizing the importance of proactive engagement and strategic planning to thrive in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

What Is the Technology Supercycle?

In today's crowded marketplace, attention is currency. Value-based marketing is the investment that earns it. In today’s highly competitive era where businesses fight it out each day for their share in the industry, consumers are bombarded with marketing messages from every corner. Newspapers are filled with rampant advertisements, social media feeds overflow with promotional content, email inboxes are inundated with marketing copies, and even physical spaces are no longer immune to the constant barrage of "buy this" or "try that." The marketing landscape has turned pretty tough, but what practices make businesses see themselves over the shore? Or, in this crowded and noisy marketplace, how can businesses stand out and truly connect with their target audience? The answer lies in value-based marketing— an approach that shifts the focus from simply promoting products or services and refraining from being advertorial to emphasizing on demonstrating the inherent value a brand can offer to its customers. It’s less about being bullish with your marketing campaigns and goals and more about staying focused on building genuine relationships, fostering trust, and ultimately, earning customer loyalty in a sustainable and meaningful way. Value-based marketing- How is it a winning strategy in a crowded marketplace Today's consumers are bombarded with messages, and since they do not like them, they've become quite adept at filtering out noise. Traditional and self-promotional marketing messages often get lost in the sea of information and leave the customers disenchanted with the business. Value-based marketing, however, cuts through the clutter by offering something different— insightful content, helpful solutions, and genuine connections. By focusing on value first, brands can grab the attention of their audience and establish themselves as a trusted resource, not just another advertisement. Cuts through the clutter- Living in a time when marketing appears boisterous and customers are growing increasingly skeptical about the claims businesses make, value-based marketing is something to watch out for. Modern-day consumers don't want to be sold to; instead, they want to be informed and empowered. Value-based marketing prioritizes delivering value to customers throughout the entire marketing process, rather than just focusing on making sales. This naturally facilitates trust through transparency, authenticity, and genuine concern for the customer's needs. By providing valuable information, educational content, and helpful resources, brands demonstrate their expertise and establish themselves as a trustworthy source. Fosters trust and credibility- The last few years in marketing have been largely characterized by emotions. Contemporary customers look for that emotional connection in whatever marketing is directed at them. Marketers too try to leverage the emotional element in their marketing programs through advertising, public relations, etc. For this reason and catering to modern-day needs, it goes beyond talking about features and benefits. Instead, it taps into the emotions, values, and aspirations of the target audience. By understanding their desires, fears, and motivations, businesses can craft marketing messages that resonate on a deeper level. This emotional connection is crucial for building brand loyalty and fostering long-term relationships with customers. Creates emotional connections- When you provide genuine value, it doesn't go unnoticed. When subjected to value-based marketing, consumers are more likely to share valuable content, recommend your brand, and engage with your marketing efforts if they perceive it as informative and helpful. This organic reach and engagement not only saves on marketing costs but also expands a brand's reach to a wider audience through word-of-mouth marketing and social sharing. It is this aspect of value-based marketing that generates tremendous organic reach and engagement for businesses. Generates organic reach and engagement- What, if not customer loyalty, can be more rewarding for a business? Value-based marketing goes beyond traditional marketing in that it doesn't stop at the point of sale but moves up to make the customers stay loyal. It does so by building long-term relationships with customers by consistently providing value even after the initial purchase. This can be achieved through excellent customer service, personalized experiences, and continued educational content that keeps your brand relevant and top-of-mind. By consistently demonstrating your commitment to your customers' well-being, you command great loyalty and encourage repeat business. Builds customer loyalty- Implementing Value-Based Marketing Even though value-based marketing can be significantly yielding for businesses, the question of “how to integrate value-based marketing into one’s business strategies” remains a tough nut to crack. Despite such decisional challenges that businesses routinely face, below are some ways through which businesses can integrate value-based practices in their activities. Understanding your ideal customer's needs, wants, and challenges is crucial for crafting relevant and valuable content. So, the identification of needs becomes preliminary. Identify your target audience- Don't just talk about your product or service— instead, explain how it solves real problems for your target audience. After all, no customer likes boasting and blabbering about one’s products because that’s the easiest thing to do, and gone are the days when customers used to fall for them. Focus on providing solutions- Create informative blog posts, helpful guides, insightful videos, or engaging social media content that educates and empowers your audience. Through this, businesses can establish a connection with them. Offer valuable content- Being phony can put a business in a precarious situation. Businesses should not make exaggerated claims or misleading statements. Instead, they can build trust by being honest and upfront about their brand and its offerings. Be authentic and transparent- It’s recommended that businesses be very keen to what their customers have to say. Engaging with the audience by actively listening to their voices & grievances, and promptly responding to their feedback and concerns, and using their insights to improve marketing efforts can help build relationships on a personal level. Listen and respond- Summing up Marketing has come of age. The modern day customers will fail to associate themselves with anything that is everything, but emotional. Businesses, therefore, ought to find novel ways of creating value for them and coming up with smart ways to let them know that they are held dearly and close to their hearts. To make this happen, value-based marketing emerges as a strong beacon of trust, authenticity, and genuine connection. By emphasizing value outreach to the target audience, contemporary businesses can cut through the clutter, build lasting relationships, and ultimately achieve sustainable business growth.

Stories, News & Mentions about BEINFORMED

Beinformed’s Stories on HackerNoon

Beinformed's News & Mentions